The Salary History Dilemma Is Shaping the Future of Talent Acquisition
Hiring is undergoing a seismic shift—and at the center of this transformation lies an increasingly controversial question: “What was your last salary?” Once considered standard, the salary history question is now being challenged on ethical, legal, and strategic grounds. From Silicon Valley startups to Fortune 500 companies, organizations are rethinking its value—and risk.
Salary history refers to the compensation a candidate has received in previous roles, including base pay, bonuses, equity, and benefits. For decades, it’s played a critical—yet often invisible—role in shaping offers, negotiations, and hiring decisions. But does it still make sense in today’s hiring environment?
This blog explores the evolving role of salary history in hiring, backed by data, real-world practices, and expert analysis. We’ll evaluate the perspectives of both employers and candidates, spotlight emerging trends, and offer recommendations for companies looking to future-proof their hiring strategy.
Key takeaway: Salary history is no longer just a formality—it’s a flashpoint in the debate over fair and strategic hiring.
Also Read: Top AI Interview Platforms in 2025: Features & Comparison
Understanding Salary History in Hiring
It’s More Than a Number: What Salary History Really Reveals
At face value, salary history appears to offer a simple metric: what a candidate was previously paid. But beneath the surface, it reflects a complex interplay of role expectations, market conditions, negotiation power, and even systemic bias.
Components of salary history may include:
- Base salary
- Bonuses and commissions
- Stock options or equity
- Benefits packages
- Perks and non-monetary compensation
A 2023 report by WorldatWork found that 67% of U.S. employers collected some form of salary history when possible. However, only 34% relied heavily on it to inform their compensation decisions, signaling a shift toward salary expectation-based models.
Industry-specific practices:
- Finance and law: Traditionally use salary history as a proxy for candidate seniority and deal-making power.
- Tech: Startups are increasingly ditching history-based models in favor of transparent compensation bands.
- Healthcare: Often constrained by union pay scales or regulatory guidelines, where history may be less relevant.
Impact on offers and negotiations:
- Research by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found that disclosing prior salary resulted in lower initial offers by up to 7%.
- Conversely, hiding salary history encouraged companies to make offers based on the role’s value, not the individual’s past.
Key takeaway: Salary history can create misalignments between role value and candidate worth, leading to inequitable outcomes.
Also Read: Top LinkedIn Candidate Sourcing Strategies for Hiring Success
Why Do Companies Ask for Salary History?
What’s the Business Case? Efficiency vs. Equity
Despite rising scrutiny, many companies still ask about salary history. The logic typically falls into three broad categories.
Assessing Candidate Qualifications and Market Value
Recruiters often view salary history as a rough benchmark of:
- The candidate’s seniority
- The scope of their previous responsibilities
- What the market has previously deemed their value
Yet this assumption can backfire. According to Payscale’s 2024 Compensation Best Practices Report, 61% of high-performing candidates are underpaid in their current roles due to outdated compensation structures or systemic inequity.
Budgeting and Salary Structuring
From a financial planning lens, hiring managers may use salary history to:
- Estimate the budget needed to close a candidate
- Prevent overpaying or misaligning internal compensation levels
But this leads to a circular problem—anchoring compensation to past inequities rather than current role value.
Biases and Assumptions Embedded in Salary History
Salary history can unintentionally perpetuate:
- Gender and racial pay gaps (as documented by Harvard Business Review in 2023)
- Geographic biases, especially in remote hiring
- Penalties for career breaks, particularly affecting women and caregivers
Key takeaway: Salary history may offer short-term clarity, but it risks reinforcing long-term inequities.
Also Read: Interview Simulation: How Practice can Improve Your Job Success
The Legal Landscape Around Salary History
Global Policy Is Catching Up with Changing Norms
As the controversy around salary history grows, lawmakers are stepping in. A wave of salary history bans has reshaped the legal landscape, especially in the U.S.
Legal restrictions in the U.S.
- 21 U.S. states (including California, New York, and Illinois) have implemented bans prohibiting employers from asking about a candidate’s salary history.
- Cities like New York City and Philadelphia have even stricter regulations.
- Non-compliance penalties range from civil fines to class-action lawsuits.
Global regulations
- United Kingdom: No federal ban, but the Equality and Human Rights Commission advises against asking.
- Canada: Provinces like Ontario have introduced pay transparency legislation.
- European Union: The EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023) will require employers to disclose pay ranges and restrict reliance on salary history.
Employer implications
- Compliance means updating job applications, interview scripts, and training HR teams.
- Tools like JobTwine allow structured, regulation-compliant interviews by focusing on skills, expectations, and cultural fit, rather than outdated compensation data.
Key takeaway: The law is shifting toward salary transparency and equity—companies must adapt or risk legal exposure and reputational harm.
Also Read: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in Hiring: Strategies for Success
Should Salary History Matter in Hiring?
Looking Forward: A Framework for Modern Compensation Strategy
This question lies at the intersection of fairness, performance, and business efficiency. The answer? It depends—on context, intent, and execution.
Arguments for using salary history
- Benchmarking: For niche roles with limited market data, history can offer a reference point.
- Fraud detection: In certain financial services roles, it helps verify resumes.
- Executive hiring: Where past compensation often reflects high-stakes deal-making and influence.
Arguments against
- Anchoring bias: According to McKinsey, anchoring on past salary leads to “compensation inertia”—especially in underrepresented groups.
- Reduces negotiation leverage: Candidates may lowball themselves out of fear.
- Limits mobility: Workers looking to switch sectors or careers are penalized by irrelevant compensation benchmarks.
Toward a fairer hiring process
Forward-looking organizations are adopting the following practices:
- Salary transparency from the start: Sharing salary bands in job postings increases application rates by 30%, according to LinkedIn’s 2024 Hiring Trends Report.
- Expectation-based interviews: Asking candidates what they expect, not what they earned.
- Structured interviews and assessment tools: Platforms like JobTwine allow employers to evaluate candidates based on actual skills and simulate real-world challenges, reducing reliance on salary proxies.
Key takeaway: Ditching salary history doesn’t mean flying blind—it means making smarter, data-driven, and more equitable decisions.
Also Read: Mastering Interview Techniques: Types and How to Use Them Effectively
Conclusion
Salary History Is Outdated. Strategic Hiring Is the Future.
Salary history has served as a shortcut for decades—but its utility is now outweighed by its risks. In an age of skills-based hiring, pay transparency, and remote work, relying on outdated metrics to determine future value is not only ineffective—it’s unfair.
Companies must shift their focus:
- From history to potential
- From bias to data
- From tradition to strategy
Platforms like JobTwine are leading this transformation by offering AI-powered, compliant, and human-centered interview simulations that prioritize capabilities over compensation history.
The future of hiring is:
- Transparent
- Equitable
- Performance-driven
And salary history? It may soon be just that—history.
Frequently Asked Questions:
Is it legal for employers to ask about salary history?
That depends on your location. In many U.S. states and cities, it’s now illegal to ask. Always check local laws before including salary history questions in your hiring process.
Should I disclose my salary history if asked?
If you’re in a location where it’s legal, consider whether disclosing would help or hinder your negotiation. Focus instead on your salary expectations and market benchmarks.
How can companies ensure fair compensation without salary history?
Use transparent salary bands, standardized assessments, and platforms like JobTwine to evaluate candidates based on skills, not past pay.
What’s the difference between salary history and salary expectations?
Salary history is what you earned before. Salary expectations are what you believe you’re worth in your next role. The latter reflects your growth, goals, and the current market.
How does salary history affect gender and racial pay gaps?
Relying on salary history often perpetuates existing wage disparities. Research shows that women and people of color are more likely to be underpaid—and anchoring on their past salaries only reinforces the gap.
